ICT R&D Grants Programme for Asia Pacific
|
Project Title:
1.0 Synthesis This project aims to utilize an existing rural Internet connection through the rural-development and peace ICT initiative PFnet, to pilot a distance learning facility in one of Solomon Islands' rural Community High Schools in partnership with the University of South Pacific (USP) Centre of Honiara. The People First Network, or PFnet, was conceived and initiated by the UNDP/UNOPS project Solomon Islands Development Administration and Participatory Planning Programme (SIDAPP) in the Ministry of Provincial Government and Rural Development. It has already established a web site development portal, a successful Internet Café, conducted research and field testing of a robust, proven and sustainable technology that permits remote locations on islands across thousands of square kilometres to have access to Internet emails using a simple computer, short-wave radio, and solar power. Consequently, in October 2001, the PFnet Internet gateway base station was established and the countrys first rural community email facility was opened at Sasamungga, Choiseul. This first station is well suited to develop pilot applications of the ICTs in various sectors, including education. It is later intended to expand this network to over 25 PFnet-managed and many more self-funding stations and therefore the pre-existence of good models will be invaluable. This project will entail the design and application of a distance-learning programme especially designed to integrate with the PFnet facilities. It will create a computing centre at the community school close to the email station utilising existing solar power. Local capacity will be built to sustain the facility working in cooperation with the PFnet programme. The project will also study the impacts of the email station on the wider community, focusing on vulnerable groups particularly women and young people. In doing so, this project will provide invaluable baseline data for further expansion of PFnet to all rural areas of the country, and provide an excellent example of an application serving the needs of one information stakeholder group (i.e. education users and providers). 2.0 Research Problem One of the gravest obstacles to development in the Solomon Islands now is the difficulty in communicating between trusted family members and professional peers. It is precisely in deprived and remote areas that basic telecommunication has the most value and impact. For such locations, telecommunication is the only and vital link with the outside world, either to ensure health security, access to education, or essential contacts with family and professional peers. It is also a major block to investors, tourism and enterprise growth. However, such telecommunications are very scarce outside of Honiara. The teledensity of 0.3 per 100 rural inhabitants is the lowest in the region and even those lines are concentrated only in a few provincial centres. Since 1998, the social unrest has badly affected the country. The ethnic tension between Guadalcanal and Malaita, which has left approximately 100 people dead, decimated the economy and displaced thousands, has also badly eroded national solidarity. Three out of nine provinces have expressed their wish to break away as separate countries. Lack of trusted information, misinformation and the absence of reliable communication links have only served to heighten the misunderstanding and tension between communities. To address this problem at the very grassroots level, the People First Network is an email service that facilitates communication and information flows to and from the remote provinces of the Solomon Islands. It was launched in February 2001 with the opening of an Internet Café in Honiara, which has been a resounding success and is already functioning in a self-sustainable way. This was followed in October 2001 with the establishment of the country's first community-run rural email facility [Annex 1] at the remote village of Sasamungga in Choiseul Province and which will also serve as a model for future expansion. PFnet uses an email system based on a robust, proven and sustainable technology that permits remote locations on islands across thousands of square kilometres to have access to Internet emails using a simple computer, short-wave radio, and solar power. It aims to: - Facilitate point-to-point communications to/from the remote provinces of the Solomon Islands; - Facilitate rural development and peace-related information flows among all social groups; - Facilitate the exchange of information between communities and development partners, NGOs, government offices, the media, businesses and other stakeholders. PFnet is established as a not-for-profit organisation through the Ministry of Provincial Government and Rural Development. It had received funding and technical support from the Solomon Islands Development Administration and Participatory Planning Programme (SIDAPP), a project of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS). It had also received start-up funding capital from the governments of Britain, Japan and the Republic of China through their missions in Solomon Islands. One of SIDAPPs final recommendations made to UNDP and Solomon Islands Government during the closing tripartite review meeting held in Honiara on 19th November 2001 was for the National Government to give the [PFnet] top priority during the two-year reconstruction period as means to achieve national unity by facilitating the flow of development information and services to most of the countrys villages. In the recommendations, PFnet has been included as a vital component of the proposed National Integrated Rural and Provincial Development Programme (NIRPDP) that would ensure equitable development amongst the countries provinces and regions. Both Government and UNDP have approved the NIRPDP, and the project is expected to commence in January 2003. 3.0 Research FindingsThis report covers the first two-months activities of the Distance Learning Research Project undertaken in Sasamunga, Choisuel Province in Solomon Islands after the first transfer of funds was received by RDVA from Asia Media Information Center (AMIC). The scope of the report focus on the implementation of the preparatory activities indicated in the workplan. Hence, at this stage, the report cannot identify any initial findings of the research activities, the mid term report however may cover the project proper. The other part of this interim report covers financial expenses of the first payment made to RDVA on the 02nd April 2002 by AMIC. Since the implementation of the project is only at its preparatory stage, the report will identify activities in the work plan that RDVA as the implementing organization has successfully completed. These are listed bellow.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name of researcher conducting the interview: |
|
|
Date of interview: |
|
|
Time of interview: |
|
|
How long did the interview take?: |
|
|
Additional notes/observations: | |
Instructions to participants: You are invited to participate in an interview about the new PFNet distance learning project. The interview should take about 15-20 minutes. Everything you say will remain confidential to the researchers and project leaders. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask.
|
Name: [2] |
|
|
Date of birth: |
|
|
Sex: |
|
|
Where they live: |
|
|
Enrolled for a course through distance education? (yes or no): |
All participants should answer questions 1 - 7. Interviewers should feel free to ask additional questions as appropriate/required. These questions, and answers, should be noted in question 8.
The wording of the questions is only a suggestion. Interviewers can adapt the wording as appropriate and/or explain the questions to participants.
1. What is the highest educational qualification you have achieved?
2. Where did you go to school and/or university?
3. Have you ever studied by distance before?
4. Would you like to continue your studies?
4a. Why or why not? (This question is to identify barriers or impediments to continuing education.)
4b. If YES, what would you like to do?
5. Have you used a computer before?
If NO: (These questions are to help identify barriers to the use of technology, particularly for groups such as women, young people, less well-educated etc.)
5a. What is the MAIN reason you do not use computers?
5b. What are the other reasons you do not use computers?
5c. What would be helpful in supporting your using computers? (Now go to question 6).
If YES:
5a. How much experience have you had with computers? (Try to get as much detail as possible so an evaluation can be made about the participant's computing knowledge and skills.)
5b. What have you mainly used computers for (for example, word processing, games etc.)?
5c. Have you used e-mail before?
5c(i). If NO: What do you know about e-mail? (now go to Question 6)
5c(ii). If YES: How much experience have you had with using e-mail (for example can you send an e-mail with an attachment)?
5c(iii). What do you mainly use e-mail for?
5c(iv). Have you used Sasamungga e-mail station?
5c(v). If NO, why have you not used it? (now go to Question 6)
5c(vi). If YES, how often have you used it?
5c(vii). If YES, what your MAIN use for the e-mail?
5c(viii). What is your SECOND main use for the e-mail?
5c(ix). What do you think are the main benefits that the e-mail station has brought (e.g., how has it helped you)?
Please encourage participants to give SPECIFIC examples of how it has helped them (i.e., benefits in terms of money, time, opportunities etc.).
6. Would you like to participate in training to learn (more) computer skills?
6b. If YES, what sort of things would you like to learn?
7. What do you know about the PFNet?
8. Any additional questions identified as part of the interview process.
INTERVIEW COVERSHEET
PROJECT OUTCOMES [3]
INTERVIEW SCHEDULE 2: FOR ADMINISTRATION AT THE END OF THE PROJECT
|
Name of researcher conducting the interview: |
|
|
Date of interview: |
|
|
Time of interview: |
|
|
How long did the interview take?: |
|
|
Additional notes/observations: | |
Instructions to participants: You are invited to participate in an interview about the new PFNet distance learning project. The interview should take about 15 minutes. Everything you say will remain confidential to the researchers and project leaders. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask.
|
Name: |
|
|
Date of birth: |
|
|
Sex: |
|
|
Where they live: |
|
|
Enrolled for a course through distance education? (yes or no): |
|
|
Highest qualification achieved at school and/or university: |
All participants should answer questions 1 - 5. Interviewers should feel free to ask additional questions as appropriate/required. These questions, and answers, should be noted in question 6.
The wording of the questions is only a suggestion. Interviewers can adapt the wording as appropriate and/or explain the questions to participants.
1. Would you like to undertake studies by distance education?
1a. Why or why not?
1b. If YES, what would you like to do?
2. Have you used a computer before? (If NO: Go to question 3.)
If YES:
2a. How much experience have you had with computers?
2b. What have you mainly used computers for (for example, word processing, games etc.)?
2c. Have you used e-mail before?
2c(i). If NO: What do you know about e-mail?
2c(ii). If YES: How much experience have you had with using e-mail (for example can you send an e-mail with an attachment)?
2c(iii). What do you mainly use e-mail for?
2c(iv). Have you used Sasamungga e-mail station?
2c(v). If NO, why have you not used it? (now go to Question 6)
2c(vi). If YES, how often have you used it?
2c(vii). If YES, what your MAIN use for the e-mail?
2c(viii).What is your SECOND main use for the e-mail?
2c(ix). What do you think are the main benefits that the e-mail station has brought (e.g., how has it helped you)?
Please encourage participants to give SPECIFIC examples of how it has helped them (i.e., benefits in terms of money, time, opportunities etc.).
3. If NO: (These questions are to help identify barriers to the use of technology, particularly for groups such as women, young people, less well-educated etc.)
3a. What is the MAIN reason you do not use computers?
3b. What are the other reasons you do not use computers?
3c. What would be helpful in supporting your using computers? (Now go to question 6).
4. Have you done any computer training? (get details of training if they have done some)
5. What sort of an impact do you think PFNet has had on the community?
5. Any additional questions identified as part of the interview process.
Qualitative interviews with staff, students and RDVs
My recommendation for this part of the evaluation (Objective 2.0) is that three focus groups be run, one each for the staff, students and RDVs. The groups should be run towards the latter end of the semester and be used as a means to assess "how things are going" and to identify any problems that have arisen. These should be fairly informal, with at least one person recording notes of the discussions. An additional focus group can be run with the RDVs at the completion of the project as per Objective 4.0.
As the data is not going to be used in a comparative capacity (such as the interview schedules above), there is a higher degree of flexibility if you wish to include additional or different questions.
Discussion questions for students
1. What are the bestects of studying through distance using PFNet?
2. What are the worstects of studying through distance using PFNet?
3. How would you describe your overall experience so far using PFNet for distance education?
4. Do you plan to study again by distance using the PFNet? Why or why not?
5. What do recommend can be done to improve distance education through the use of PFNet?
Discussion questions for staff
1. What are the bestects of using PFNet for distance education?
2. What are the worstects of using PFNet for distance education?
3. How would you describe your overall experience so far with the use of PFNet for distance education?
4. What is your impression of the students' experience of using PFNet
5. What do recommend can be done to improve distance education through the use of PFNet?
Discussion questions for RDVs (the same questions can be used for an end of project assessment as per Objective 4.0)
1. From your observation of and experience with PFNet, what do you think are the bestects?
2. What do you think are the worstects?
3. Have you observed students or staff having any particular problems with the use of PFNet?
4. What sort of impacts do you believe PFNet is having on the community?
5. Do you have any suggestions as to how distance education through PFNet can be improved?
Quantitative data to be collected on PFNet usage
Data on rural PFNet e-mail station as per the current usage statistics (http://www.peoplefirst.net.sb/General/PFnet_Stats.htm)
It would be good under the heading of "Main subject of e-mail sent by customers" if the education category could be further broken down to indicate sub-headings such as:
· tutor/lecturer query
· contact with other students in the course
· course related e-mails (e.g., e-mailing an organsiation for information for an assignment etc.)
· submission of assignments
Additionally, information on contact-response time when students make a query of a lecturer/tutor/USP and turn-around-time for marking of assignments should be collected. Does USP Centre have this data for previous years? If not, a comparison can be made between current students using PFNet and those submitting through the mailbag.
Workshops and training data
For each workshop/training session delivered, quantitative data should be collected on:
· number of participants
· demographic profiles of participants (age, sex, level of education, employment etc.)
· workshop/training evaluation (It is in the project assessment schedule that any training should also be evaluated. Do you have an existing evaluation for training workshops, or does one need to be written? If so, did you want me to assist with this?)
Distance education data
Quantitative data should be collected on the following:
· number and demographic profile of students enrolled in USP distance education courses (pre-project as well as after implementation of project)
· courses enrolled for
· number of assignments word processed & number of assignments non-word processed (it would be helpful to do this by student as well, as some may mix methods)
· number of assignments submitted through PFNet & number of assignments posted via USP mail bag (it would be helpful to do this by student as well, as some may mix methods)
· turn-around-time for marking of assignments by method of submission (PFNet or posted)
· performance indicators (attrition rates, grades, enrollment for subsequent courses) (it would be good to analyse these by course enrolled for; method of submission of assignments; age; gender etc.)
A general course evaluation questionnaire is also scheduled to be administered. This is different than the one in the back of the Extension course books. It should focus on the students' experience of PFNet. I'd suggest that it should be administered within the last fortnight of the semester, before the exam period. I can design this if you wish, but I will need your help in giving me some indication, based on your contact with the students, of what in particular you think should be considered.
(Annex d.2)
Dear PFNet User,
Thank you for using our e-mail system. To make sure that we are meeting the needs of our users, we would appreciate it if you could take a few minutes to tell us more about what you have used PFNet for this time. Your answers are strictly confidential.
|
1. Today's date: |
|
2. Your age in years: |
|
3. Gender: |
Male |
Female |
|
4. Where do you live?: |
5. What is your highest level of education completed?:
|
None |
|
|
Primary |
|
|
Secondary |
|
|
College |
|
|
Graduate |
|
|
Postgraduate |
|
|
Doctorate |
|
|
Other (please explain): |
|
6. What countries did you send your e-mail(s) to?:
7. What were the reasons for your e-mail(s)?
|
Education (please answer question 8 on page 2 as well) |
|
|
Family & friends |
|
|
Medical |
|
|
NGO/Project |
|
|
Government Admin. |
|
|
Business |
|
|
Professional |
|
|
Travel |
|
|
Construction |
|
|
Church |
|
|
Agriculture |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Web search |
|
|
Media |
|
|
Electoral |
|
|
Other (please explain): |
|
8. If you were sending an e-mail for educational reasons, what were the main purposes? (Tick as many as apply)
|
Contacting a tutor or lecturer to make a query |
|
|
Contacting other student(s) in the course |
|
|
Getting course related information (e.g., e-mailing an organisation for information for an assignment etc.) |
|
|
Submitting an assignment |
|
|
Other (please explain): |
|
|
Of the above reasons, what was the MAIN reason for using the e-mail today? |
Approximately how long did you spend doing your e-mail?
|
Less than 5 minutes |
|
|
5 - 15 minutes |
|
|
15 - 30 minutes |
|
|
30 -45 minutes |
|
|
45 - 60 minutes |
|
|
60 - 90 minutes |
|
|
More than 90 minutes |
What time of day did you send your e-mail(s)?
|
Morning |
|
|
Mid-day |
|
|
Afternoon |
|
|
Early evening |
|
|
Evening |
Did you experience any difficulties while doing your e-mails? If so, please explain:
Is there anything else you wish to comment on about your e-mails today?
Thank you for your participation.
(Annex e)
TIMETABLE FOR
SASAMUGA DISTANCE LEARNING RESEARCH ACTIVITIES
30th May-14 September 2002
|
ACTIVITIES |
EXPECTED OUTPUT |
TIMEFRAME |
|
Sasamuga Distance Learning Research |
-Training of Researchers -Researchers and managers travel to Sasamunga -Courtesy call to Provincial Premier and Secretary at Taro -Travel to Sasamunga -Computers installed and other equipments -Opening of the training workshop -Consultation and Orientation meeting with Schools held & awareness raising meeting held with wider community -Training of participating teachers, RDVAs and students -Management return to Honiara -Researchers remain on site to support student and conduct research i. Helping students to use the computers and email to complete course schedule and communicate with tutors ii. Keeping a log for each student, to record email usage -Researchers conduct 1st research interview program into the impact of PFnet -Start of Pfnet station customer exit interviews (target 100 interviews) -USP Second Semester starts -Support Distance learning students
-USP distance learning programme tested -Data analyzed by researchers -Monitoring data collected and sent to base via email station -Mid-term evaluator travel to Sasamunga to conduct evaluation -RDVAs mid-project evaluation -Researchers conduct 2nd research interview program -Interviews for staff and students -Closing public meetings -Researchers period end, return to base -Interviews of researchers -End of research period, evaluation and final report submitted |
30 May-7 June 8 June 8 June 9 June 10 June 11 June
12-16 June 12-16 June 18 June June-August June-August June-August 19 June 19 June July July-August July-August 31st July-August 19th June-August 30 July
August August August 30 August September 14 September |
Please Note: This is just a tentative timetable. You need to add some more information and fine-tune it.
(Annex f)
TRAINING DESIGN
DISTANCE LEARNING RESEARCH ON THE IMPACT OF RURAL EMAIL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
TRAINING OF TRAINERS
Sasamunga
Choisuel Province
3rd June to 7th June 2002
NOTES FOR THE PARTICIPANTS
This training kit contains:
a) The design and schedule for the Distance Learning Research Workshop Scheduled for the 30th May to 7th June 2002 at Rural Development Division (RDD), 5th Floor Anthony Saru Building, Honiara.
b) Various reference materials required.
The content and the training process will be assessed. We will solicit your feedbacks and observations to improve the training of trainers workshop design and content.
Thank you,
Sasamunga Distance Learning Project Team
DISTANCE LEARNING RESEARCH ON THE IMPACT OF RURAL EMAIL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
TRAINING OF TRAINERS
Sasamunga
Choisuel Province
3rd June to 7th June 2002
TRAINING DESIGN
|
RATIONALE |
Sasamunga distance learning research project aims to utilize an existing rural Internet connection through the rural-development and peace ICT initiative PFnet, to pilot a distance learning facility at Sasamunga Community High Schools in partnership with the University of South Pacific (USP) Centre in Honiara. This workshop entails the design and application of a distance-learning programme especially designed to integrate with the PFnet facilities. It will establish a computing centre at the Community High School close to the email station utilising existing solar power. Local capacity will be built to sustain the facility working in cooperation with the PFnet programme. The project will also study the impacts of the email station on the wider community, focusing on vulnerable groups particularly women and young people. In doing so, this project will provide invaluable baseline data for the further expansion of PFnet to all rural areas of the country and provide an excellent example of an application serving the needs of one information stakeholder group (i.e. education users and providers). This training of trainers workshop is therefore necessary to ensure the researchers acquire the right skills to conduct the research. |
|
GENERAL OBJECTIVE |
Introduce researchers to the general objectives of PFnet and distance learning research by exploiting new possibilities arising from ICTs, in particular the People First Network. |
|
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES |
At the end of the workshop, the participants will be able to: Exploit an existing PFnet community email facility to pilot a distance learning computer centre in a rural village school as a model for expanding the PFnet rural email network through out the country. Provide baseline research data on the impacts of the distance learning centre and generally the impacts of the email facility on the wider community. Build rural and national capacity in the use of ICTs especially in the education sector. |
PARTICIPANTS |
Distance Learning Researchers recruited by the Rural Development Volunteers Association (RDVA). |
|
EXPECTED OUTPUTS |
Researchers understood and appreciate the aim and objective of PFnet and Distance Learning Research Project; Material needs identified and research interview questionnaire discussed and finalized; USP Distance Learning materials discussed and finalized; Researchers acquired the skills to conduct three computer training modules; |
|
METHODOLOGY |
Lectures/Workshops/Discussions |
DISTANCE LEARNING RESEARCH ON THE IMPACT OF RURAL EMAIL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
TRAINING OF TRAINERS
Sasamunga
TRAINING SCHEDULE
Day 1
TIME |
ACTIVITY |
PERSON ASSIGNED |
|
10.00 10.05 10.15 12.00 1.30 3.00 3.15 4.30 |
Opening Prayer Overview of training programme Session 1 Lecture: PFnet introduction and orientation Lunch BreakDiscussion 1Project objectives Research impacts of PFnet BreakSession 2Facilitate distance learning by email End of session |
Peter Pitia Alan Agassi David Leeming David Leeming/Alan Agassi David Leeming/Alan Agassi David Leeming |
TRAINING SCHEDULE
Day 2
|
TIME |
ACTIVITY |
PERSON ASSIGNED |
|
10.00 10.05 10.10 11.00 12.00 1.30 3.00 3.15 4.30 |
Opening Prayer Brief review of Day 1 Discussion 2 Timeline Discuss the timing Discuss next few days training Discussion 3 Research Interviews Discuss practicalities. How and when? Targets? - Develop plan for practical schedule deadlines, etc End of session |
Patson Taniveke Alan Agassi David Leeming David Leeming/Alan Agassi David Leeming/Alan Agassi David Leeming/Alan Agassi |
TRAINING SCHEDULE
Day 3
|
TIME |
ACTIVITY |
PERSON ASSIGNED |
|
10.00 10.05 10.10 11.00 12.00 1.15 3.00 3.30 4.30 |
Opening Prayer Brief review of Day 2 Session 3: USP Distance Learning course Discussion 4 -discussion on course materials Lunch Break Discussion continue - logging interactions for each student
WorkshopEnd of session |
Alan Agassi Peter Pitia Dr. Glyn Galo Dr. Galo/Leeming/Alan Dr. Galo/Leeming/Alan Dr. Galo/Leeming/Alan |
TRAINING SCHEDULE
Day 4
|
TIME |
ACTIVITY |
PERSON ASSIGNED |
|
10.00 10.05 10.10 11.00 12.00 1.15 2.30 3.00 3.30 4.30 |
Opening Prayer Brief review of Day 3 Session 4: Computer training Familiarisation with laptops Session 5: Go through module 1 Lunch BreakSession 6: Go through module 2 WorkshopResearchers try giving module 1 and 2 BreakDiscussion 5: Solar power, viruses and any other technical matters |
Peter Pitia Patson Taniveke David Leeming Gilmour Pio Frank Lulu Gilmour/Frank/David David Leeming |
TRAINING SCHEDULE
Day 5
|
TIME |
ACTIVITY |
PERSON ASSIGNED |
|
10.00 10.05 10.10 12.00 1.30 3.00 3.30 4.30 |
Opening Prayer Brief review of Day 4 Workshop: Timetable and practicalities Lunch BreakWorkshop Continue - draft detailed timeline BreakDiscussion 6Discuss each item on the timeline and add details/fine tuning Complete draft documents Any other business or recap on any matters End of session |
Patson Taniveke Peter Pitia David/Alan David/Alan David/Alan |
[1]This semi-structured qualitative survey is to collect baseline data for the project. It is designed for administration on a sample of participants from the catchment area - both those involved directly with the project and those who are not. A random sample is not required. The sample however, should be as representative of the catchment community as possible and include those identified as disadvantaged groups (women and youth). The sample should also include teachers who have been identified as part of the target beneficiaries (as per Objective 3.0).
[2] If confidentiality is an issue, this can be changed to an ID number. A list of which participant corresponds to which ID number can be kept separately.
[3] This survey is for administration at the end of the project, again to a representative sample from the catchment area. It is to assess the impact of the project on the broader community. The data can be compared to that from the first survey. Specifically, it assesses: whether the project has heightened interest in studying by distance; changes in computer use; participation in computer training; and heightened awareness of PFNet. These are identified in the project proposal as outcomes.
Read the Abstract and Project Proposal
Read the Final Technical Report
Last modified 2004-06-23 02:47 PM




